Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies

Rapid Prototyping technologies, besides producing pieces with complex geometries and with high dimensional accuracy, can optimize the development process of a product by providing tests and improving communication among the people involved in the project. This article presents and discusses two Rapi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi, Botura Junior, Galdenoro, Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente, Figliolia, Amanda Coelho, Garcia Ferrari, Livia
Format:	Online
Language:	Spanish
Published:	Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales 2018
Subjects:	Prototipado rápid Tecnología aditiva Fresado CNC Escaneado 3D Manufactura Rapid prototyping Additive technology CNC milling 3D scanning Manufacturing.
Online Access:	https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/213

id	ojs-article-213
record_format	ojs
institution	Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales
collection	Revista de Ciencia y Tecnologia RECyT
language	Spanish
topic	Prototipado rápid Tecnología aditiva Fresado CNC Escaneado 3D Manufactura Rapid prototyping Additive technology CNC milling 3D scanning Manufacturing.
spellingShingle	Prototipado rápid Tecnología aditiva Fresado CNC Escaneado 3D Manufactura Rapid prototyping Additive technology CNC milling 3D scanning Manufacturing. Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi Botura Junior, Galdenoro Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Figliolia, Amanda Coelho Garcia Ferrari, Livia Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies
topic_facet	Prototipado rápid Tecnología aditiva Fresado CNC Escaneado 3D Manufactura Rapid prototyping Additive technology CNC milling 3D scanning Manufacturing.
format	Online
author	Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi Botura Junior, Galdenoro Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Figliolia, Amanda Coelho Garcia Ferrari, Livia
author_facet	Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi Botura Junior, Galdenoro Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Figliolia, Amanda Coelho Garcia Ferrari, Livia
author_sort	Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi
title	Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies
title_short	Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies
title_full	Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies
title_fullStr	Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies
title_full_unstemmed	Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies
title_sort	process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different rapid prototyping technologies
title_alt	Proceso, complejidad y calidad: comparación entre objetos similares producidos por diferentes tecnologías de Prototipado Rápido Processo, complexidade e qualidade: comparação entre artefatos semelhantes produzidos por diferentes tecnologias de Prototipagem Rápida
description	Rapid Prototyping technologies, besides producing pieces with complex geometries and with high dimensional accuracy, can optimize the development process of a product by providing tests and improving communication among the people involved in the project. This article presents and discusses two Rapid Prototyping technologies, one additive and another subtractive (CNC milling), used in the production of two pieces from the same digital file. These pieces were compared, considering parameters such as: production time, cost, material and fidelity regarding the original file. The results show that additive technology is recommended for models with complex geometries or that require internal details, whereas the subtractive technology is characterized by lower production cost, better surface finish and diversity of material use, making the choice of one or another technology for a specific project depend on the objectives for which the prototype is being produced.
publisher	Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales
publishDate	2018
url	https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/213
work_keys_str_mv	AT goulartnishimurapaulalumi processcomplexityandqualitycomparisonbetweensimilarobjectsproducedbydifferentrapidprototypingtechnologies AT boturajuniorgaldenoro processcomplexityandqualitycomparisonbetweensimilarobjectsproducedbydifferentrapidprototypingtechnologies AT rodriguesosmarvicente processcomplexityandqualitycomparisonbetweensimilarobjectsproducedbydifferentrapidprototypingtechnologies AT figlioliaamandacoelho processcomplexityandqualitycomparisonbetweensimilarobjectsproducedbydifferentrapidprototypingtechnologies AT garciaferrarilivia processcomplexityandqualitycomparisonbetweensimilarobjectsproducedbydifferentrapidprototypingtechnologies AT goulartnishimurapaulalumi procesocomplejidadycalidadcomparacionentreobjetossimilaresproducidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipadorapido AT boturajuniorgaldenoro procesocomplejidadycalidadcomparacionentreobjetossimilaresproducidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipadorapido AT rodriguesosmarvicente procesocomplejidadycalidadcomparacionentreobjetossimilaresproducidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipadorapido AT figlioliaamandacoelho procesocomplejidadycalidadcomparacionentreobjetossimilaresproducidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipadorapido AT garciaferrarilivia procesocomplejidadycalidadcomparacionentreobjetossimilaresproducidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipadorapido AT goulartnishimurapaulalumi processocomplexidadeequalidadecomparacaoentreartefatossemelhantesproduzidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipagemrapida AT boturajuniorgaldenoro processocomplexidadeequalidadecomparacaoentreartefatossemelhantesproduzidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipagemrapida AT rodriguesosmarvicente processocomplexidadeequalidadecomparacaoentreartefatossemelhantesproduzidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipagemrapida AT figlioliaamandacoelho processocomplexidadeequalidadecomparacaoentreartefatossemelhantesproduzidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipagemrapida AT garciaferrarilivia processocomplexidadeequalidadecomparacaoentreartefatossemelhantesproduzidospordiferentestecnologiasdeprototipagemrapida
_version_	1800236195809067008
spelling	ojs-article-2132020-03-06T10:56:30Z Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies Proceso, complejidad y calidad: comparación entre objetos similares producidos por diferentes tecnologías de Prototipado Rápido Processo, complexidade e qualidade: comparação entre artefatos semelhantes produzidos por diferentes tecnologias de Prototipagem Rápida Goulart Nishimura, Paula Lumi Botura Junior, Galdenoro Rodrigues, Osmar Vicente Figliolia, Amanda Coelho Garcia Ferrari, Livia Prototipado rápid Tecnología aditiva Fresado CNC Escaneado 3D Manufactura Rapid prototyping Additive technology CNC milling 3D scanning Manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping technologies, besides producing pieces with complex geometries and with high dimensional accuracy, can optimize the development process of a product by providing tests and improving communication among the people involved in the project. This article presents and discusses two Rapid Prototyping technologies, one additive and another subtractive (CNC milling), used in the production of two pieces from the same digital file. These pieces were compared, considering parameters such as: production time, cost, material and fidelity regarding the original file. The results show that additive technology is recommended for models with complex geometries or that require internal details, whereas the subtractive technology is characterized by lower production cost, better surface finish and diversity of material use, making the choice of one or another technology for a specific project depend on the objectives for which the prototype is being produced. Las tecnologías de Prototipado Rápido, además de producir piezas con geometrías complejas y con alta precisión dimensional, pueden optimizar el proceso de desarrollo de un producto por proporcionar pruebas y mejorar la comunicación entre los involucrados en el proyecto. El presente artículo presenta y discute dos tecnologías de Prototipado Rápido, una aditiva y otra sustractiva (fresado CNC), utilizadas para producir dos piezas a partir de un mismo archivo digital. Estas piezas fueron comparadas, considerando parámetros como: tiempo de producción, costo, material y fidelidad al archivo original. Los resultados muestran que la tecnología aditiva es recomendada para modelos con geometrías complejas o que necesiten de detalles internos, y que la tecnología sustractiva se caracteriza por un menor costo de producción, mejor acabado superficial y diversidad de uso de materiales, haciendo que la elección de una u otra tecnología para un determinado proyecto dependa de los objetivos para que se está produciendo el prototipo. As tecnologias de Prototipagem Rápida, além de produzirem peças com geometrias complexas e com alta precisão dimensional, podem otimizar o processo de desenvolvimento de um produto por proporcionarem testes e melhorarem a comunicação entre os envolvidos no projeto. O presente artigo apresenta e discute duas tecnologiasde Prototipagem Rápida, uma aditiva e outra subtrativa (usinagem CNC), utilizadas na produção de duas peças a partir do mesmo arquivo digital. Essas peças foram comparadas, considerando-se parâmetros como: tempo de produção, custo, material e fidelidade ao arquivo original. Os resultados mostram que a tecnologia aditiva é recomendada para modelos com geometrias complexas ou que necessitem de detalhamento interno, enquanto a tecnologiasubtrativa se caracteriza pelo menor custo de produção, melhor acabamento superficial e diversidade de uso de materiais, fazendo com que a escolha de uma ou outra tecnologia em um determinado projeto dependa dos objetivos para o qual o protótipo está sendo produzido.  Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales 2018-08-23 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/213 Argentine Journal of Science and Technology; Vol. 29 No. 1 (2018); 50-56 Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 29 Núm. 1 (2018); 50-56 1851-7587 0329-8922 spa https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/213/302

Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies

Similar Items