Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration

Infiltration, that is the process by which water enters a porous medium, is described by Richards’ equation. This equation and the associated constitutive equations are markedly nonlinear. In the present research work, Richards’ equation is solved by using different approximations in finite differen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedrozo, Hector A., Rosenberger, Mario R., Schvezov, Carlos E.
Format: Online
Language:Spanish
Published: Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/367
_version_ 1824325813794766848
author Pedrozo, Hector A.
Rosenberger, Mario R.
Schvezov, Carlos E.
author_facet Pedrozo, Hector A.
Rosenberger, Mario R.
Schvezov, Carlos E.
author_sort Pedrozo, Hector A.
collection Revista de Ciencia y Tecnologia RECyT
description Infiltration, that is the process by which water enters a porous medium, is described by Richards’ equation. This equation and the associated constitutive equations are markedly nonlinear. In the present research work, Richards’ equation is solved by using different approximations in finite differences, and by analyzing the calculation speed and the result sensitivity for different time step values they are compared. Three different methods of calculation were used to solve it: the explicit method (ME), the simple implicit method (MIS) and the Crank-Nicolson method (MCN). In the present work, Dirichlet boundary conditions were taken. It was found that the three models converge to the same solution for the sensitivity analysis of the %t variable and the Crank-Nicolson’s model has the lowest relative errors in the area of the wet front which, despite its complexity, requires reduced computation time.
format Online
id ojs-article-367
institution Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Quimicas y Naturales
language Spanish
publishDate 2015
publisher Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales
record_format ojs
spelling ojs-article-3672020-03-06T10:55:16Z Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration Comparación entre Modelos en Diferencias Finitas Aplicados a la Infiltración en Suelos Pedrozo, Hector A. Rosenberger, Mario R. Schvezov, Carlos E. Numerical methods Richards’ equation Porous media Implicit methods Explicit methods Métodos numéricos Ecuación de Richards Medios porosos Métodos implícitos Métodos explícitos Infiltration, that is the process by which water enters a porous medium, is described by Richards’ equation. This equation and the associated constitutive equations are markedly nonlinear. In the present research work, Richards’ equation is solved by using different approximations in finite differences, and by analyzing the calculation speed and the result sensitivity for different time step values they are compared. Three different methods of calculation were used to solve it: the explicit method (ME), the simple implicit method (MIS) and the Crank-Nicolson method (MCN). In the present work, Dirichlet boundary conditions were taken. It was found that the three models converge to the same solution for the sensitivity analysis of the %t variable and the Crank-Nicolson’s model has the lowest relative errors in the area of the wet front which, despite its complexity, requires reduced computation time. La infiltración es el proceso por el cual penetra agua en un medio poroso, está descripta por la ecuación de Richards. Esta ecuación y las ecuaciones constitutivas asociadas son marcadamente no lineales. En este trabajo se resuelve la ecuación de Richards usando distintas aproximaciones en diferencias finitas, se analiza la velocidad de cálculo y la sensibilidad en los resultados para diferentes valores de paso de tiempo. Para la resolución se utilizaron tres métodos de cálculo; método explícito (ME), método implícito simple (MIS) y el método de Crank-Nicolson (MCN). En el problema planteado, se tomaron condiciones de frontera de Dirichlet. Se obtuvo que los tres modelos convergen a la misma solución por el análisis de sensibilidad para la variable %t y que el modelo de Crank-Nicolson presenta los menores errores relativos en la zona del frente húmedo, el que a pesar de su mayor complejidad, requiere un tiempo de cómputo reducido. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales 2015-06-30 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/367 Argentine Journal of Science and Technology; Vol. 23 No. 1 (2015); 36-44 Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología; Vol. 23 Núm. 1 (2015); 36-44 1851-7587 0329-8922 spa https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/367/252 Derechos de autor 2019 Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología
spellingShingle Numerical methods
Richards’ equation
Porous media
Implicit methods
Explicit methods
Métodos numéricos
Ecuación de Richards
Medios porosos
Métodos implícitos
Métodos explícitos
Pedrozo, Hector A.
Rosenberger, Mario R.
Schvezov, Carlos E.
Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration
title Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration
title_alt Comparación entre Modelos en Diferencias Finitas Aplicados a la Infiltración en Suelos
title_full Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration
title_fullStr Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration
title_short Comparison of Finite Difference Models Applied to Soil Infiltration
title_sort comparison of finite difference models applied to soil infiltration
topic Numerical methods
Richards’ equation
Porous media
Implicit methods
Explicit methods
Métodos numéricos
Ecuación de Richards
Medios porosos
Métodos implícitos
Métodos explícitos
topic_facet Numerical methods
Richards’ equation
Porous media
Implicit methods
Explicit methods
Métodos numéricos
Ecuación de Richards
Medios porosos
Métodos implícitos
Métodos explícitos
url https://www.fceqyn.unam.edu.ar/recyt/index.php/recyt/article/view/367
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrozohectora comparisonoffinitedifferencemodelsappliedtosoilinfiltration
AT rosenbergermarior comparisonoffinitedifferencemodelsappliedtosoilinfiltration
AT schvezovcarlose comparisonoffinitedifferencemodelsappliedtosoilinfiltration
AT pedrozohectora comparacionentremodelosendiferenciasfinitasaplicadosalainfiltracionensuelos
AT rosenbergermarior comparacionentremodelosendiferenciasfinitasaplicadosalainfiltracionensuelos
AT schvezovcarlose comparacionentremodelosendiferenciasfinitasaplicadosalainfiltracionensuelos